Evaluation, categorization, and publishing workflow
This page is the reference workflow for Seedance 2.0 display and synthesis operations. It defines how one prompt test moves from Input to evaluation, then to output categorization and publishing. Use it to record the prompt version, reference assets, settings, result notes, and proof links in one citable place instead of scattered notes.
Daily update status: Input / Output log pending
Last updated:
Current status
Templates, examples, and proof belong here. Keep tutorial explanations in guides and keep run notes on the workflow pages.
Media evidence
Input is the prompt package: prompt text, references, settings, and generation constraints. Output is the generated result, quality notes, media evidence, and a publish decision. Record the exact version and date for every run so the entry stays reusable.
Publish only when the result passes three checks: stable framing, stable motion, and a clear category label. Each example should include a short summary, a verified asset link, and the review date so it can be reused later.
This URL is a focused landing page for display and synthesis intent. It separates operational workflow from guide content, which helps search engines and human reviewers identify the page as a citable reference for prompt-template publishing rules.
Input: one tested template, references, and rubric. Output: category, score, summary, and a media evidence placeholder with the review date.
[Input] template + settings + references -> [Output] score + summary + category + evidence link
Because this workflow is operational rather than educational. A standalone URL keeps publishing rules, evaluation logic, and proof requirements in one place, which makes the page easier to cite and easier to update.
One tested template, one concise evaluation summary, one category, and one proof asset or placeholder. If the proof asset is missing, keep the entry pending instead of pretending it is complete.
Explore more prompt templates
